Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Liam Gavrielides vs Daisuke Sumizawa Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gavrielides vs Sumizawa analysis and find out who is favored!
Liam Gavrielides vs Daisuke Sumizawa Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gavrielides has won 46.95% of points on his second serve, while Sumizawa has won 47.28%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gavrielides, in recent form, has won 55.17% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sumizawa has won 48.17%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.6% and 30.84% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gavrielides has saved 61.13% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sumizawa has saved 52.08% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gavrielides has won 54.05% of matches played (W/L 40/ 34), with Sumizawa winning 53.06% (W/L 26/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gavrielides has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 12/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 6/ 10). Sumizawa has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 122/ 102), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Gavrielides has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.02% of matches (W/L 36/ 25), where as Sumizawa has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.06% of matches (W/L 26/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gavrielides has played against opponents with an average rank of 160.15 while Sumizawa has played against players with an average rank of 79.1.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gavrielides has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sumizawa has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gavrielides has converted 48.03% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sumizawa has converted 38.96% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gavrielides 0 - 0 Sumizawa
647
Rank
643
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
751
Rank
687
High
25
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
52% (64-58)
Career Total W/L
52% (170-158)
55% (18-15)
YTD W/L
50% (7-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gavrielides VS Sumizawa H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Liam Gavrielides | Daisuke Sumizawa |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (18/15) | 50% (7/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (42/36) | 47% (16/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (384/342) | 49% (169/173) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 60% (6/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (10/6) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.36 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 129 | 17 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 73 | 27 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:42 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 201.15 | 48.86 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1239/2085) | 62% (464/746) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (869/1239) | 66% (307/464) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (396/846) | 48% (136/282) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (99/209) | 43% (24/56) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (880/2096) | 38% (277/735) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 58% (18/13) | 50% (7/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (17/32) | 50% (7/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 46% (6/13) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (20/15) | 100% (5/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (20/5) | 0% (5/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 22% (9/2) |
Liam Gavrielides Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Stefan Popovic
Player
Liam Gavrielides
81%
(
60 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Gavrielides
Player
Peter Buldorini
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Gavrielides
Player
Yannik Kelm
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Gavrielides
Player
George Lazarov
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
78%
(
43 of
55)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Liam Gavrielides
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Gavrielides
Player
Alexander Frusina
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Gavrielides
Player
Milos Mikovic
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandr Braynin
Player
Liam Gavrielides
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
34 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Gavrielides
Player
Ruben Hartig
54%
(
43 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Liam Gavrielides
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
6-0 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Daisuke Sumizawa Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Keisuke Saitoh
Player
Daisuke Sumizawa
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
53%
(
60 of
113)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
49 of
113)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Branko Djuric
Player
Daisuke Sumizawa
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
5
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Buldorini
Player
Daisuke Sumizawa
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daisuke Sumizawa
Player
Sergej Zivkovic
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Keisuke Saitoh
Player
Daisuke Sumizawa
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daisuke Sumizawa
Player
Koki Matsuda
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daisuke Sumizawa
Player
Naoki Tajima
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
4-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-7(3) 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Daisuke Sumizawa
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
22
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daisuke Sumizawa
Player
Ryotaro Shimomura
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
45%
(
46 of
102)
2
Aces
6
8
Double Faults
3
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
46 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
102)
112
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Gavrielides Vs Sumizawa Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
